- Related Stories
-
Blu-ray vs. HD DVD: I don't care who wins!
January 18, 2008 -
False starts in race to future of DVDs
October 15, 2007 -
Blu-ray vs. HD DVD: War without end
October 10, 2007 -
FAQ: HD DVD vs. Blu-ray
October 1, 2005 - Related Blogs
-
Can anything save HD DVD?
January 17, 2008 -
Toshiba cuts HD DVD player prices
January 14, 2008 -
Toshiba 'disappointed' over Warner Bros. decision
January 6, 2008 -
Warner goes Blu-ray exclusively, delivering crushing blow to HD DVD
January 4, 2008
This time last year the so-called high-definition format war between HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc had become so entrenched that the buzz at the 2007 Consumer Electronics Show was around combo players and discs, like LG's Super Multi Blue and Warner Bros.' Total HD format. People hoped for a manageable truce that would stop scaring consumers from choosing a side.
Neither combo players nor the dual-format discs really went anywhere, however. And 12 months later the predictions are not of which side will emerge the victor, but exactly how hard Blu-ray backers are laughing all the way to the bank. Convincing Warner Bros. in January to give up its stance as neutral partner to both in favor of throwing all of its Hollywood heft behind Blu-ray was a major coup for the Sony-backed format.
But HD DVD backers have shown they're not giving up so easily, as evidenced by Toshiba's decision to lower prices on its HD DVD players a week after the Warner announcement. So what's next for the beleaguered format and the world of HD video? Here are some answers to the most common questions.
Q: Is the format fight over already?
Not yet, but it's close. HD DVD made big gains at the end of 2007, due mostly to holiday promotions as low as $99 in some cases, to bring the number of units sold to a dead-even tie: both Blu-ray and HD DVD had 49 percent of unit sales for the year, according the The NPD Group, which tracks retail sales data.
The Warner announcement on January 4 represented a seismic shift, though: The week of January 12 showed player sales distributed 90 percent Blu-ray, 7 percent HD DVD, and 3 percent for combo players. The week after, January 19, showed less polarized results, with Blu-ray getting 63 percent of sales, HD DVD 33 percent, and combo players 4 percent. NPD does not normally give out weekly data, and does not offer a more recent update of sales figures.
Momentum isn't the only thing that's shifted. Prices have come way down in the last year. HD DVD players now range in price between $150 and $500, and Blu-ray players between $250 and $1,000.
Of all the major Hollywood Studios only two, Paramount and Universal, have agreements to release their titles exclusively on HD DVD. The rest--Sony, Disney, MGM, and now Warner Bros.--are pledged to Blu-ray. And there's talk that even Paramount and Universal could be persuaded to switch to Blu-ray also when those contracts end.
Q: Is it time to abandon HD DVD?
Not quite. Much was made of Blu-ray's overwhelming sales dominance the week following the Warner announcement in January. But it's hard to base the viability of an entire format on a single week's worth of data since there are other factors at play here.
Toshiba, the main backer of HD DVD, lowered prices on its players significantly the following week, and it's probably not fair to call the game for Blu-ray before all Sunday circulars are updated to show the new pricing ($149 now versus $299 on the HD-A3 model) and customers have a chance to be lured into stores. It's also important to note that there are several "bundling" promotions being offered by a variety of manufacturers, including a high-def video player with the purchase of an HDTV or other electronics item. It's a practice that tends to juice the numbers for both sides.
"Are people organically running out and buying $400 Blu-ray players? Probably not," said Paul Erickson, director of DVD and HD market research for The NPD Group. "Are people going out in droves to buy $149 HD DVD players? Possibly, but obviously not as much as the HD DVD side would want."
And Blu-ray isn't necessarily the perfect solution even if it becomes the default high-def format. As CNET Reviews points out, there are several reasons to proceed with caution still, including the software upgrade process for Blu-ray players, and the availability of your favorite movies and TV shows.
See more CNET content tagged:
HD-DVD,
Blu-ray,
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.,
backer,
HD-DVD player

in the comments section.
Oops, I spoke too soon.
Digital downloads will replace hard media at some point (On Demand is beginning to show movies still in theaters), and with the ability to stream all sorts of digital media to your tv and stereo, consumers might skip bluray alltogether.
A couple of terabyte drives from now, bluray could become obsolete itself.
in households, Blu-ray is beating HD-DVD handily.
Blu-ray burners here are already down to $599. Too much, yes,
but how much are HD-DVD burners right now. Burners you can
pop into your computer and start burning. I know on my Mac, I
can get two different burners and my burning software (Toast)
already supports them.
How's it going on HD-DVD in the software sector? (I'm really
asking.)
Also, something this article does not account for is the ps3 'effect' Everyone that I know that owns a ps3 owns or rents blueray discs.
(I personally own a ps3 and over 100 blueray discs)
What does the preceding prove? Just that my experience is somewhat limited, as your own experience would seem to be.
--mark d.
So the number of STUDIOS may be tilted in Blu Ray's favor, but the number of TITLES isn't necessarily - it could even become tilted in the other direction.
So long that they'll both be hawking their independent, ill conceived standards while feature rich, affordable HD downloads reach the mainstream.
I want them to PAY for every time they stuck it to the consumer with their greedy format wars.
Was that too strong? ;<)
T
because of the Warner announcement. Well, yeah, they're the
winner alright, of a hell of a lot of used players from all the
bluray customers that are beginning to find out that their
players are in essence useless but a few months of spending
1000 dollars on the format.
HD DVD had it right from day one. They're accessible and stable
and in the end a million times better for the consumer. If in the
end, for some weird reason, enough people end up deciding
that the more expensive and useless format called bluray is
better, then you didn't spend much money at all and still have a
great upscaling DVD player to ignore the bluray ripoff until the
next format comes along.
Bluray seemed better, but in the end, it was HD DVD that had it
right all along.
I guarantee Paramount and Universal will be format neutral before 2009.
HD DVD has a hard time with 1080p. Blue-ray has the space (And more importantly the bandwidth) to support 1440p and might be able to push 2160p. This is with software update to the current PS3. with a hardware update 2160p would be easy. HD DVD was obsolete from the day it hit the shelf.
1440p TVs have already hit some markets and 2160p is coming faster than you want to think.
Long live the Blue!
Forget the format war and the price war I want features and the feature I want is to be able to put the content on any screen. And DRM makes the disk about as helpful as a coaster.
I have too many hard drives lying around.
I'd pay $10 for a blank disc.. just no COASTERS PLEASE.
As soon as we can burn those HD movies from thepiratebay.org for a cheap price, the burner sales will go up ten times....
For example, a blank Blu-ray that is 50 GB
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-jyvBK8lVhwd/App/Product/Item/Main.aspx?i=158BNR50AH
is $47.99 (I didnt shop around, quick google search).
This is with the tech still relatively in its infancy and not yet proliferated. DVDs started out similarly. I wouldnt be surprised if this dropped substantially as more people bought into it.
The 'customer visible' differences between the two formats (that are the basis on which we will end up making decisions) to my knowledge are:
- HD-DVD has a provision for making backup copies of a DVD for personal use and BluRay does not AFAIK
- HD-DVD doesn't have a 'profile' update or software update mechanism -- so nobody's HD-DVD player can become obsolete. BluRay however does have updateable 'profiles' and many people already own BluRay players that are obsolete because they lack the capability required for the new profiles even if their firmware is flashed.
- Anything else?
I might be wrong about those points. But my real point is -- these are the factors that matter to consumers. As a tech journo, you should focus on that instead. Help us decide. Please!!
Here is a list of advantages of HD DVD:
Blutamax has extra DRM included.
Blutamax is not region free unlike HD DVD.
HD DVD players have a network connection and can download interactive disks content and firmware grades automatically. Blutamax players dont and cant.
Every single standalone Blutamax player on sale now is already obsolete due to 'profile' updates needed (i.e. they couldnt get the hardware right first time round).
Blutamax has less capacity than HD DVDs 51GB disks
Lots of Blutamax films are encoded in the legacy MPEG 2 codec which measn the picture quality really suffers.
All Blutamax disks have to waste massive amounts of space on uncompressed sound tracks because Dolby HD support is not standard on Blutamax players.
You can buy an Xbox 360 AND a standalone HD DVD player for less than the price of a PS3. Dont put up with the PS3's inferior graphics and lousy games.
You can have a standard DVD on the flip side of an HD DVD disk. Dlutamax cant cope with that.
Oh and Blutamax players cost twice price too.
the thing is, even if i were in the market for an upscaling dvd player at $79, would I even want to pay just $50 extra for a format that's dying?
people might consider that a waste of $50 rather than an added bonus.
i really wanted hd-dvd to win.
Some stores that keep track of sales stats per employee...they REALLY don't want to sell them only to have their performance take a hit a few days later.
If you want an HD DVD player, raid the dumpsters behind Best Buy in 3 months.
I believe things are the way they are because Sony has deep pockets and that is it. For this reason I think it would be great if HD DVD won out. Is it probable? No, but one can hope.
Sony has a very bad history of being over priced and limiting much like Apple. Do they make good stuff? Yes they do but not any better than anyone else who can sell it at half the price.
lets start with:
"Blu-Ray doesn't have a player worth owning under $400"
well how about the PS3. not only is it a blu ray player, and an upscaling dvd player, it is also a game console.
next untruth: "It's discs are physically inferior to HD DVD and DVD"
wrong again. blu ray disks hold much more data than hd-dvd disks. how much you ask. how about almost 20 gigaBYTES more. that allows for better quality uncompressed audio such as HD-DTS, and more special features.
next untruth:
"the players are slow and cumbersome"
nope. my PS3 boots up0 and starts playing a movie before my toshiba A35 (the best hd-dvd player money can buy) even says hello... which is slow and cumbersome you say?
next untruth:
"all rights to the content on Blu-Ray are completely removed from the consumer"
you have all the same rights that you have with DVD disks. given they did make it more difficult to copy and pirate the movies.
HD-DVD is region free and pirates love it for that reason.... could that be your real reason for all the blu ray hate? i bet it is.
If and when HD DVD burning players with hard drives hit the market (and if double sided HD DVD-r disks ever sell for less than $20), you can talk about managed copy (Hint, with the companies making blank media starting to abandon HD DVD this will never happen).
It's a shame there had to be two formats to begin with and people are in this predicament.
However, I'm guessing many HD DVD owners bought on price alone. You get what you pay for.
They're upset and bitter. Everyone else is happily enjoying their Blu-rays.
While I agree HD-DVD specs were solidified before Bluray's, that is not the only reason to support a format. Also, look at the consumer electronics space - do you see a whole bunch of companies on one side leading to vibrant development and one lonely company carrying the format on the other side. You decide.
Sorry you're jealous/upset. You backed the wrong horse. Sell it while you still can.
I must correct myself. In another talkback I mentioned that the HD-A30 only did 1080p at 24 fps. I got that from the CNET review.
Either the CNET review is outdated or it's wrong.
My workplace has started servicing Toshiba's HD DVD units. I'm very impressed with the quality.
From experience I can say that the HD-A30 does both 1080p 60 and 1080p 24.
To the point: $150 HD-A3 being close to the cost of an upconverting DVD player, I don't think so.
You can get a Toshiba upconverting dvd player for $60 if you look hard enough. You can get a DVD/VCR that upconverts, made by Toshiba, for under $100.
So, if you're talking 3 times the cost then sure, they're close.
Duel format players suck. Who in their right mind would pay close to a grand for a DVD player? HD or not.
A BIG problem Toshiba has is awareness.
A lot of my customers and friends ask me about HD. All of them know Blueray. The name is out there in a big way. Something I hear a lot after a mention of Blueray is "isn't there some other kind of HD too"?
People don't know HD DVD and they don't know Toshiba sells it.
Toshiba has three things going for it: 1 price, 2 better format and 3 they're not Sony. They have to do a better job promoting HD DVD to consumers.
Of course, it didn't help that Microsoft stabbed Toshiba in the back by not offering an XBox with a built in HD-DVD drive. But what else would one expect from Microsoft?
On the other hand, I do agree that MS haven't done enough to push HD DVD. They should have made it almost difficult to buy a 360 WITHOUT a bundled HD DVD add-on.
So, you're actually getting better product by paying less for an HD-DVD unit.
Who do you expect people to listen to? The owners know what quality they have gotten. Should they listen to someone who is ignorant of the whole topic, like you?
When I do buy an HD DVD player (which may be soon because of the price cuts), I won't be buying any movie in HD that I already own in SD DVD.
SD DVD looks great on my 42" LCD TV, especially those that were mastered digitally. I see no reason to repurchase the over 300 movies I own just to see them slightly sharper.
And, there is just no way in heck I will ever pay upwards of $30 for a new movie release on HD DVD.
So, if I do buy an HD DVD player (HD-A30) for under $200, I will be looking for HD titles I don't already own (that will be tough) and I sure won't be buying any new HD releases unless I can get them at the same price as the SD version.
You can win and still buy, as long as you buy what you want and need, not what they tell you you want and need.
This leaves Other complaining over Encryption systems issues which backer are lightly to push for a solution to after they've got enough momentum behind the standard.
Having a 75GB version would allow for movies Like Lord of the Rings to be properly printed and does leave hollywood thinking about how it could make some more extended lengh movies and leaves us consumers gutted they didn't think of this problem sooner when the hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy film was made because with some extended time and a bit more work and effort it could have been Great.
- HD DVD prices go down due to demand and value
-
by samkass
February 5, 2008 6:22 PM PST
- HD DVD players are going to keep dropping in prices as the
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
- fire sale?
-
by Miked350z
February 6, 2008 5:21 AM PST
- I'd agree with this comment. It makes sense for toshiba to
-
View
all 2 replies
-
- HD DVD is cheap because they need to clean house
-
by jrm125
February 6, 2008 9:10 AM PST
- If they wait any longer word will totally be out to even the less than tech savvy that the format is a total loss. They need to sell it while they still can. Ironically, following the holidays, despite the fire sale of gear, Blu ray still came out on top.
-
View
reply
-
See all 172 Comments >>companies try to move inventory in the face of low demand and
reduced value (since it's basically going to be just an expensive
DVD player in a couple years).
Reporting dropping HD DVD player prices as if it's some sort of
game-changer is just disingenuous. Blu-Ray won, but c|net
knows it can get a few more ad downloads if they declare the
format war not over yet.
liquidate their stock. Although folks they dont do their homework
before purchasing will get burned. Thats what return policies are
for I guess. 2 studios will not and can not provide enough
content to keep hd-dvd alive :(
No one wants HD DVD