May 31, 2005 6:51 AM PDT

'Kodak, don't take my Kodachrome'

  • Print
Related Stories

Kodak's CEO to step down in June

May 11, 2005

Digital camera market peaked too soon

April 28, 2005

To film geeks everywhere, Kodak might as well have declared the death of color with its decision to discontinue its Kodachrome Super 8 film.
The New York Times

The story "'Kodak, don't take my Kodachrome'" published May 31, 2005 at 6:51 AM is no longer available on CNET News.

Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 2 comments
Why film's life may be shorter than proponents hope
by Razzl June 2, 2005 7:56 AM PDT
In the early stages of the digital revolution film proponents fed our denial with the comforting thought that the sharpness and color palette of premium films such as Kodachrome and Fujifilm's Velvia would ensure that film would always be in demand among artists and would survive in the market for them. Unfortunately, after reading a few chapters on how film is produced as an industrial product, I'm sad to report that the process involves so much specialized machinery and chemistry that it seems unlikely to me that it can be produced on a "boutique" basis. Only mega-companies like Kodak and its former film rivals had the financial, legal, and technical clout to run the types of plants required to produce this stuff at an acceptably consistent level of quality. I fear the life of film may come to an abrupt end in the coming decade rather than a gentle decline...
Reply to this comment
Why film's life may be shorter than proponents hope
by Razzl June 2, 2005 7:56 AM PDT
In the early stages of the digital revolution film proponents fed our denial with the comforting thought that the sharpness and color palette of premium films such as Kodachrome and Fujifilm's Velvia would ensure that film would always be in demand among artists and would survive in the market for them. Unfortunately, after reading a few chapters on how film is produced as an industrial product, I'm sad to report that the process involves so much specialized machinery and chemistry that it seems unlikely to me that it can be produced on a "boutique" basis. Only mega-companies like Kodak and its former film rivals had the financial, legal, and technical clout to run the types of plants required to produce this stuff at an acceptably consistent level of quality. I fear the life of film may come to an abrupt end in the coming decade rather than a gentle decline...
Reply to this comment

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Eastman Kodak (2.97%) 0.21 7.29
Dow Jones Industrials (3.31%) 270.00 8,419.09
S&P 500 (3.99%) 32.60 848.81
NASDAQ (3.70%) 51.73 1,449.80
CNET TECH (3.64%) 36.93 1,051.13
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right